Merging Photos For Extended DOF (June 15, 2007)

Comments and questions about the photo essays published on JuzaPhoto.

Poston Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:38 pm

Image

Canon EOS 20D, Sigma 180mm f/3.5 EX APO Macro HSM, 1/160 f/4, iso 100, tripod. Mt. Lesima, Italy.

I was wandering in the grassfields of Mt. Lesima (Upper Trebbia Valley), when I saw this beautiful specimen of Clossiana euphrosyne (a bit thanks, as always, to my friend Paolo Mazzei for the ID!). This butterfly has an intense orange color and blue eyes - a beautiful subject, but unluckly it was posed very close to the background. Even with the 180 + 2x teleconverter, it was not possibile to get a good separation between subject and background, considering that it was necessary an aperture of f/18 to get the entire butterfly in sharp focus from wing to wing.

In these situations, I use the technique of merging photos to increase the depth of field. I removed the teleconverter and I set the lens on the widest aperture (well, almost - I've choosen f/4 instead of f/3.5 because it is a little sharper). I focussed on the closest wing of the butterfly, I toke a photo, then I moved slightly the focus and I toke another photo (it would be better to move the camera back and forth instead of turning the focus ring, but it is impossible unless you have a focusing rail). I repeated this procedure until I had sharp shots of every portion of the subject - even though the butterfly was almost parallel to the camera, I've had to take eleven photos, because at these reproduction ratios the depth of field at f/4 is really shallow!

Image

Image

Two of the eleven shots that I merged to get the entire butterfly in sharp focus at f/4. (just converted from RAW and resized)

Of course, the subject must be perfectly still in every photo - it the pose is different, it is not possible to merge the photos. After downloading the RAW files on my PC, I opened them with the same setting in ACR, and I copied all the photos into a single photoshop file, into separate layers. With the layer mask, I've taken the sharp portion of every photo - the result is that the entire subject is sharp, but the background remains blurred, because it is out of focus in every photo. It looks quite simple, but actually this tecnique is not easy, in particular when you have many shots and really shallow depth of field - you must be very careful with blending, otherwise you get an unnatural result, with impossible depth of field effects. To get better results, the sharp areas of every shot must overlap a bit.

Once you have merged the photos, you can process the image as every other photo. Here, I did a slight contrast enhancement and I increased a little the saturation, in particular in the eyes. The technique of merging photos for extended DOF is not easy, and I don't recommend to use it on regular basis - whenever possible, I recommed to isolate the subject from background using long lenses and placing the subject as much parallel as possible to the camera, to reduce the necessity of small apertues. On the other hand, when you don't have other possibilities, this technique may be the key to take a great photo in a difficult situation.

Comments and questions are welcome!Image
Last edited by Juza on Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
respirándonos, miramos la campiña que adormece el sol,
los valles y los bosques y la humilde flor,
las islas navegando por la soledad...
Juza
Site Admin :-)
User avatar
 
Posts: 5391
Location: Italy

Poston Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:28 pm

Great work! But Juza... I'm sorry if I'm being ignorant, but wouldn't it be easier doing, instead of eleven shots merged, only two?
One at f/4 for the backgroud, and one (or two if needed) with sufficient DOF for the subject (say, f/11 or f/16 should suffice) and then merge it?
Am I missing something? :?:

Thanks :wink:
Diogo Carvalho
Junior Member
User avatar
 
Posts: 251
Location: Vila Real, Portugal.

Poston Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:49 pm

I've tried, but in my opinion the results does not look natural, in particular if the subject has "fuzzy" areas as the haird of butterflies...the "problem" is that, when you take just two photos, you have to merge a photo with OOF BG with a photo that has sharp BG; if, instead, you take many photos wide open, all the photos have OOF BG, so they are a little easier to merge.
respirándonos, miramos la campiña que adormece el sol,
los valles y los bosques y la humilde flor,
las islas navegando por la soledad...
Juza
Site Admin :-)
User avatar
 
Posts: 5391
Location: Italy

Poston Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:04 pm

Juza wrote:I've tried, but in my opinion the results does not look natural, in particular if the subject has "fuzzy" areas as the haird of butterflies...the "problem" is that, when you take just two photos, you have to merge a photo with OOF BG with a photo that has sharp BG; if, instead, you take many photos wide open, all the photos have OOF BG, so they are a little easier to merge.


Ok I get it! Never had that experience, there really is a difference in "knowing the path, and walking the path"... (sorry for quoting the Matrix :lol:)
The anglefinder C must really help! I guess that task would be really hard to archive without it.

Thanks for answering,
Diogo Carvalho
Junior Member
User avatar
 
Posts: 251
Location: Vila Real, Portugal.

Poston Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:09 pm

Excellent article!
I tried this technique and now using it a lot in my pictures, of course wherever it is possible :)
Here is one of them:
[img]http://www.pbase.com/yuri_p/image/82395149/large.jpg[/img]
Canon 350D, Sigma 150mm, F/10, 1/10, ISO-200
P.S. the image resized and in medium quility.
yuri_p
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1015
Location: Israel

Poston Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:18 pm

Fantastic photo Yuri!

By the way, I've just visited your website, you have many great photos! I'd suggest to post this photo in the "Nature Photos Gallery : Comments and Critiques" section to receive more comments :)
respirándonos, miramos la campiña que adormece el sol,
los valles y los bosques y la humilde flor,
las islas navegando por la soledad...
Juza
Site Admin :-)
User avatar
 
Posts: 5391
Location: Italy

Poston Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:46 pm

Thanks Juza!
I'll post my additional photos :)
"take only pictures, leave only traces..."
yuri_p
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1015
Location: Israel

Poston Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:26 pm

Juza - amazing what you can do with technology. I don't think I'd have the patience for all that!

Karl.
Karl
gamebird
Junior Member
 
Posts: 92
Location: Northern Ireland

Poston Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:02 pm

Thanx Juza,

This is my try
Image

need the cooments
Ahmed K
Junior Member
User avatar
 
Posts: 143
Location: Bahrain

Poston Sat Nov 03, 2007 8:06 am

The result looks excellent 8-)
Maybe just try sharpening objects in focus little bit more :)
"take only pictures, leave only traces..."
yuri_p
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1015
Location: Israel

Poston Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:02 pm

good work :)
respirándonos, miramos la campiña que adormece el sol,
los valles y los bosques y la humilde flor,
las islas navegando por la soledad...
Juza
Site Admin :-)
User avatar
 
Posts: 5391
Location: Italy

Poston Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:21 pm

Hello Juza,
Can I use this method to simulate the DOF of tilt shift lens. In fact I don't how to do it by photoshop, I already have problems when taken photo. When I change the focus location, the magnification also change, how can I merge two objects with differenct size?
Philip Mok
Junior Member
 
Posts: 10

Poston Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:10 pm

the best way to do it wold be to keep the same focus and to change the camera position with a micro-metric rail :) otherwise...if the focus change is very limited the magnification difference is negligible, while with big focus changes you must use the rail...
respirándonos, miramos la campiña que adormece el sol,
los valles y los bosques y la humilde flor,
las islas navegando por la soledad...
Juza
Site Admin :-)
User avatar
 
Posts: 5391
Location: Italy

Poston Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:41 pm

Hi Juza, thanks a lot, it seems I need to move the camera perpendicular as possible. :)
Philip Mok
Junior Member
 
Posts: 10